- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by .
Viewing 1 reply thread
Viewing 1 reply thread
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Speech Synthesis › Evaluation › Acting on the evaluation result
It sounds like it would be difficult to trace back to the problem because we are using a pipeline system. How can we actually improve our system by using the data collected?
You are correct in saying that it’s very hard to trace back a problem in the output speech to a specific component in the synthesiser, especially so when the text-processing has the typical pipeline architecture.
Where possible, we will perform component-level testing and, if we are lucky, that can be done objectively (without humans) by comparing output to a gold-standard reference.
Otherwise, what we have to do is make a hypothesis, then create an experiment to test (or refute) that hypothesis. In general, this is going to require us to create two or more systems that differ in a specific way (e.g., the pronunciation dictionary is or is not carefully tuned to the speaker), then compare them in a listening test.
Some forums are only available if you are logged in. Searching will only return results from those forums if you log in.
This is the new version. Still under construction.Copyright © 2026 · Balance Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in