- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 5 months ago by .
Viewing 2 reply threads
Viewing 2 reply threads
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Speech Synthesis › DNN synthesis › Vocoder: how we can evaluate the performance of a vocoder
Hi Simon,
I tried the Word vocoder. I used it to parameterize my speech wave and reconstruct speech from parameters. when i hear the constructed voice i found it perfectly reconstructed my voice(because i can not hear any difference between the original wave and the constrcted one). My question is how can i evaluate the performance of a vocoder(method,tool).
Thanks!
If you think that WORLD gives perfect quality when vocoding (which is often called “copy synthesis”) then you either need to listen more closely, or use a better pair of headphones! You should be able to discern some artefacts of vocoding.
To evaluate copy synthesis, a MUSHRA listening test would be most appropriate. The hidden reference would be the original waveform and the lower anchor could be low-pass filtered speech.
Got it! i think i just did the experiment with my loudspeaker on my laptop,which is hard to detect differences.
After i change to my headphone. i do detect two differences:
1. My voice sometimes become trembling.
2. After the reconstruction, it seems that the background noise from the original wave is amplified and randomized,which make it become more detectable.
Some forums are only available if you are logged in. Searching will only return results from those forums if you log in.
Copyright © 2024 · Balance Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in