- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 6 months ago by .
Viewing 1 reply thread
Viewing 1 reply thread
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Speech Synthesis › Evaluation › Acting on the evaluation result
It sounds like it would be difficult to trace back to the problem because we are using a pipeline system. How can we actually improve our system by using the data collected?
You are correct in saying that it’s very hard to trace back a problem in the output speech to a specific component in the synthesiser, especially so when the text-processing has the typical pipeline architecture.
Where possible, we will perform component-level testing and, if we are lucky, that can be done objectively (without humans) by comparing output to a gold-standard reference.
Otherwise, what we have to do is make a hypothesis, then create an experiment to test (or refute) that hypothesis. In general, this is going to require us to create two or more systems that differ in a specific way (e.g., the pronunciation dictionary is or is not carefully tuned to the speaker), then compare them in a listening test.
Some forums are only available if you are logged in. Searching will only return results from those forums if you log in.
Copyright © 2024 · Balance Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in