- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 1 month ago by .
Viewing 1 reply thread
Viewing 1 reply thread
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Speech Synthesis › Festival › The Manual's description of it's POS tagger?
The Festival manual describes its POS tagger:
“Festival includes a part of speech tagger following the HMM-type taggers as found in the Xerox tagger and others (e.g. DeRose88). Part of speech tags are assigned, based on the probability distribution of TAGS given a WORD, and from ngrams of tags”
But don’t most (all?) HMM taggers use the probability of the WORD given the TAG, for the ‘likelihood’ part of the equation?? (the opposite of what the manual says)?
J&Mm 2009, Chapter5.5
Is this a typo, or is it really using these probabilities? (I added caps for clarity)
Hmm – that’s a good point, and not something I’d spotted before. It is almost certainly a typo.
Anyway, for the purposes of understanding, it’s fine to assume that Festival performs POS tagging using precisely the method described in Jurafsky & Martin.
Some forums are only available if you are logged in. Searching will only return results from those forums if you log in.
Copyright © 2024 · Balance Child Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in